You are being Marked, People…!

 

The Gold Stars of our day are being marched out and planted on your foreheads —- and what comes next is the violence…

Advertisements

What’s Coming Down the Pike

Beaten why for (why for)
Can’t take much more
(Here we go, here we go, here we go)

Push me again (again)
This is the end
(Here we go, here we go, here we go)

Skin against skin, blood and bone
You’re all by yourself but you’re not alone
You wanted in now you’re here
Driven by hate consumed by fear
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
Let the bodies hit the floor
One, nothing wrong with me
Two, nothing wrong with me
Three, nothing wrong with me
Four, nothing wrong with me
One, something’s got to give
Two, something’s got to give
Three, something’s got to give now

OIG Report I – Page 113 – Speaking of Intent…

There were points in the investigation when the debate about the use of consent versus compulsory process was particularly pronounced. Based on the
evidence we reviewed, in or about March 2016, Page asked Strzok, on behalf of McCabe, to create a list of tasks that the Department had either refused to undertake or “asked to let them negotiate with counsel,” even if the FBI ultimately agreed with the outcome. Page told us that McCabe suggested the list after she told him that Strzok and FBI Attorney 1 were “increasingly growing concerned about…the little things that are being left on the cutting room floor and…the deference to” the line prosecutors on how best to obtain evidence. On March 24, 2016, Strzok wrote to FBI Attorney 1 and the Lead Analyst describing the proposed list

In the email, Strzok provided a rough list of the items he was considering ” including and wrote, “Problem is it’s been death by a thousand cuts.
Strzok told us that at the time he wrote this email, he was “aggravated by the limitations” that the prosecutors were placing on the FBI’s ability to obtain evidence and felt that “if you add up this delta over a bunch of decisions, all of a sudden it becomes substantive.” Strzok and Page told us that they did not believe a list was ever finalized.

Let’s think about – who we are talking about here – and what we know about Hillary’s crew’s efforts related to her communications.

1st – She set up a “private” server to conduct communications — even though she’d spent 8 years in the White House and knew how serious document retention was considered.

— In fact, it’s obvious she went with a non-Gov official system —- because she wanted to avoid Oversight and future FOIA requests.

We see this as well in the FACT that some of the Highest Classified Documents discovered were sent using other private accounts altogether and were discovered because the people involved in the email chain got sloppy and forgot to use the ultra secret addresses…

2nd – The destruction of over a dozen devices Hillary’s Crew used also indicates INTENT to cover their tracks and hide what they were doing…  also called Obstruction.

3rd – the fact Hillary wasn’t interviewed until the end – and it wasn’t recorded – and she wasn’t put under oath — indicates the Mid-Term Investigation did NOT want to get to the bottom of this.

That’s just naming three things off the top of my head…

Now, consider who just told us in this quote above that they created a List of what wasn’t being done —- so they could dig hard into it…..like good little criminal hunters:

McCabe ——– Page ——- and —– Strozk….!!!!

Hey, OIG writers —- how about this as an interpretation of what you just told me:

McCabe – a man whose wife Clinton High Loyalist and DNC Darling (Terry McCullif) tapped to become a key player in Virginia Politics + gave 40% of her campaign funds…

….asks Strozk and Page —– “What loose ends haven’t we covered up yet?

The Mid-Term Team knew the servers had been Bleach Bitted and over a dozen devices had been smashed or “misplaced” or otherwise gotten rid of…

But they also knew there were 6 other devices sitting with Clinton’s lawyers they hadn’t lost or destroyed yet – and the clock was ticking – and heat was being turned up…  A report was eventually going to be written – so something needed to be done about those loose ends — as a Mafia Boss would say…

So — what do you think Strozk and Page —- two individuals who D-E-E-P-L-Y did not want Trump to become President — and who deeply favored Hillary —

wanted to do with those loose ends McCabe told them to think about?

Push to dig into them so they could be used in a criminal trial against Hillary?

or brainstorm how to get rid of them —- like so much of the other evidence and sources…?

OIG Report – Page 82 – well, that deserves some thought…

The NSD and EDVA prosecutors told the OIG that they were concerned at various points during the Midyear investigation that there was a disparity between the involvement of Department and FBI leadership in discussions about investigative steps.

Would this be the same Prosecutors we’ve just read were kept out of the loop at key moments…?

For example, while McCabe (the second in command at the FBI) attended meetings at which the Midyear agents and prosecutors debated whether and how to obtain the Mills and Samuelson laptops, the highest ranking official representing the Department’s position at those meetings was Toscas.

Yeah, deciding to give people immunity left and right — and not for the purpose of pushing them to role over on higher ups — is pretty big….  It’s good to know that was led by the highest levels of the FBI….

OIG Report I – Page 79 – “Protect Sensitive Docs”

OK — Hillary has this illegal server on which classified documents are stored and shared —- but that’s not really too bad – not enough to warrant a criminal arrest — because she had good intentions…

— but classified documents like those on her server were —- so sensitive — Lynch couldn’t allow it to be discussed in her daily briefings….

….she had to —- boil down the staff (and ears) to just a hand-picked few — to discuss them…?

The individuals normally on her briefing staff don’t have security clearances…?

….or Lynch – like a good Mafia Boss — wanted to limit who heard what she was saying and hearing….?…

Lynch said that she had a monthly meeting with NSD, and that although the Midyear investigation was too sensitive to discuss during that meeting, afterward the meeting would “skinny down” to discuss sensitive cases among a smaller group of people that included Yates, Axelrod, Carlin, Toscas, and sometimes members of her staff.

On Page 83:

Axelrod told the OIG that the difference between the role of Department leadership i0n the Midyear investigation and the typical high-profile investigation was “just a matter of degree.” He said that he and Yates relied on Toscas to bring issues to their attention at “skinny down” sessions following the biweekly meetings with NSD, but that “it wasn’t us saying okay, and what’s the latest on the email investigation?”

So, the bigger names — the Lynches and Yates — those closer to Obama —

— are telling me — while they might have all these emails we’ll never see because they used them in secret away from oversight —

are also telling me —- ‘We kept a complete “hands off” approach to this – so it would be above reproach — and in these slimmed down, mafi boss like discussions — with only those we trusted and/or had leverage over — we NEVER used leverage on them…  No siree — we made sure there were only a small number of such individuals to hear what was actually said —– but TRUST US — we made sure this was squeeky clean —- we never opened our mouths…..  Nope.  No siree…..  ABOVE REPROACH!!!  — That’s how we handled these small little friendly chats….”

OIG Report I – Page 79

Unlike the FBI’s senior leadership, senior Department officials played a more limited role in the Midyear investigation. Although Lynch, Yates, Axelrod, and Carlin described making a conscious decision to allow the career staff to handle the
Midyear investigation with minimal involvement by political appointees, they also told us that their involvement was consistent with their normal role in criminal investigations.

See — when you discover not only Clinton but Obama and other Leadership Individuals —– were using private (read: Secret) email accounts and under assumed names —-

—- HOW THE HELL do you know these key Obama individuals were not heavily involved in overseeing these investifations that could lead to their own arrests….???

That is WHY we have checks-and-balances…

….why we have laws about Safe-Guarding Gov Docs…

…Why we have FOIA…

They set up these servers and email accounts — to BYPASS —— OVERSIGHT…..!!!

Now you are TAKING THEIR WORD that they had nothing to do with the investigations that could lead to their own arrests if dominoes began to fall…

Banana Republic….